What Is Hybrid Training?
Hybrid training means lifting and endurance work in the same programme. A hybrid athlete does both on purpose. Researchers call it concurrent training, which is the term to search for if you want to read the studies.
A lot of what’s written about it comes from the lifting side: someone who loves the gym adds some conditioning, and the programme gets built around the barbell. I come at it from the endurance side. In my plans the endurance goal sets the direction and the strength work is there to support it.
The idea is less exotic than it sounds. The NHS recommends that adults do at least 150 minutes of moderate activity or 75 minutes of vigorous activity a week, plus strengthening exercises for all the major muscle groups on at least two days. That’s hybrid training at its mildest. A hybrid athlete just takes both halves more seriously.
I’ve always believed there’s more to endurance training than building a bigger engine. Your muscles, joints and bones still have to cope with the repeated demands of running for hours, which is why strength training is such an important part of how I train and coach. Strength work also gives your bones the loading that helps maintain and improve their strength, so the whole body is better prepared for endurance.
Hybrid Training, a Hybrid Plan and a Hybrid Coach
These three get lumped together, but they’re different things. Hybrid training is the style: strength and endurance work in one block. A hybrid plan is a set of sessions that does it, and you can buy one off the shelf. A hybrid coach is a person who writes the plan for you, watches how you respond and changes it.
The classic mistake is stacking two full programmes on top of each other: a complete running plan, a complete gym split and a rest day if there’s time. It looks impressive on a spreadsheet. By Wednesday you’re too tired to do either properly, and your sleep and your long run are the first things to suffer.
Sorting that out is most of a coach’s job. Each phase needs one priority. Something else has to be turned down, and the whole thing has to move when the week doesn’t go to plan. A plan written in January can’t know you’ll have a rotten fortnight at work in March. A coach you speak to every week can.
Does Lifting Get in the Way of Running?
Mostly, no. It’s the first thing most runners and triathletes want to know, and it’s a fair worry. The idea is that the two kinds of training pull against each other, so each one blunts the gains from the other. That’s the interference effect, and it has been studied a lot.
A good place to start is a 2022 meta-analysis in Sports Medicine by Schumann and colleagues. It pooled 43 studies covering 1,090 healthy adults and compared people who did both types of training with people who only lifted. Muscle size and maximal strength came out about the same in both groups. The one thing that dipped was explosive strength, the ability to produce force quickly, which matters more for jumping and sprinting than for a half marathon. That dip was bigger when strength and endurance work were done in the same session than when they were at least three hours apart. And the picture didn’t change significantly with the type of endurance work (running or cycling), how often people trained, their training status or their age (over or under 40).
The other half of the question is whether lifting helps the endurance side. A 2024 review in Sports Medicine by Llanos-Lagos and colleagues looked at 31 studies and 652 middle- and long-distance runners. Heavy lifting, meaning loads of 80 per cent of your one-rep max or more, or seven reps or fewer, improved running economy, which is how much energy it costs you to hold a given pace. The benefit was bigger at faster speeds. Lighter loads and isometric holds showed no significant improvement, although only three studies tested each. Most of the heavy-lifting programmes ran for 6 to 14 weeks at two to four sessions a week. The evidence was rated moderate to low certainty, so I wouldn’t call it settled.
For triathletes there’s a smaller study worth knowing about. In a 26-week trial published in 2021 in the International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 25 long-distance triathletes were split into two groups. Fourteen added strength training and eleven stuck to endurance training alone. The strength group became more economical on the bike over the first 14 weeks and on the run between weeks 14 and 26, and their body mass didn’t change. The endurance-only group showed no significant improvement in any of the economy measures. It’s a small study, so I hold it loosely, but it’s a fair answer to the worry about bulking up.
Interference does happen, though. Greg Nuckols, writing about it for Stronger by Science, points to the situations where it’s more likely: very high endurance volume or intensity, poor sleep, high stress, a big calorie deficit, or ramping up too fast. Most of those can be planned around, as long as somebody is paying attention.